Message From The Couple Wedding Program

Fiction Poetry

Marta Sanz wrote The Cultural last week:

I was just sworn in a poetry prize. I read poetry books that recommend silence and others are guessing. Leo haiku and Orphic texts, earthquakes, romantic and metaphysical. Verses civilians and identity. Heptasílabos and heroic verse, sonnets to ceiling tiling and bathrooms. Leo trough, hoe, basin, objects of a village that no longer exists. Transcendent poems and humorous poems, the most proud. I read so many metaphors that we no longer hear: night, lake, fog, mist, meteorologists metaphors that give the party with the lights out. I think that reading poetry is no longer worthwhile or maybe I'm getting too letraherida. I wonder what I'm looking at the poems. I correct myself: I enjoy reading putting in place of the writer, but without practicing this form of piety that is disrespectful. Suddenly, I stand before an image of the sad, someone hits a cricket in a box of Nivea, cares for, feeds him, sees him die. I learn that I like poems that are neither surly an open book and enclose them within a crypt. The poems that sound like poems only to a point.

For what I am going to add some more ...

Hands Free Masterbator

graphene with water ....

When Andre Geim and Konstantin Novos, University of Manchester developed graphene, won the Nobel Prize in Physics. This element has a border width of an atom, is one of the lighter materials, more conductive, and resistant to the ground. Among the various applications that can develop graphene, are DNA sequencing and construction of a medium with an extraordinary capacity for energy storage. But how can a computer of this material? Well ... just add water .

Graphene is a flat sheet structure of an atom thick, composed of carbon atoms densely packed in a network crystalline form of honeycomb through covalent bonds that are formed from the overlap of sp hybrid ² bonded carbons.

The name comes from GRAPHITE + ENO . In fact, the graphite structure can be considered as a stack of a large number of overlapping graphene sheets. The links between the stacked layers of graphene due to Van der Waals forces and interactions between the n orbitals of carbon atoms.

Well, now a group of researchers from Rensselaer Polvtechni University has achieved remarkable progress in the use of graphene as a material for making transistors, thereby have placed the next generation of computers, virtually the hand.

Professor Nikhil Koratkar and his team have published their discovery in a paper entitled "Tunable Bandgap in Graphene by the Controlled Adsorption of Water Molecules - Banda adjustable graphene by absorbing water molecules - . In other words, without need for expertise in Advanced Physics, it would simply be used in conjunction with water to create a graphene transistor.

Y. .. How would a transitor of these features? If we put a plate on graphene a silicon and silicon dioxide, sending water through the small space between the two, the liquid moves away from the silicon to the graphene by stopping the conduction of water and breaking the connection. This is important because water is a safe and common element, so when this technology take off, you need less toxicity than that produced with the current transistors.

tangible and immediate thing is that graphene can be solved in the short term, total connectivity problems. In combination with the possibilities dramatically higher storage, graphene transistor has the potential to make computers more resilient, much smaller and much faster than we have today. For example, a device the size of a tablet may have the processing power and memory of an entire computer network.

Now .... Imagine having a portable graphene, a material capable of becoming, because it is transparent monitor-and processor-ten times faster than silicon, which in turn, rolled and folded, which is as unbreakable as diamond and ... which has only one atom thick!

How Do You Know If An Dental Implant Is Failing

My dear friend, Vicente Luis Mora confessed in the magazine's No. 323 Chimera and before on his blog that he was the sole and exclusive author of all texts including at number 322, the magazine . an absolute falsification of a number that was devoted to literary forgery, for sake of completeness. A formidable deception perpetrated, he said, to expose the mechanisms of legitimation, reception, perhaps canonization etc., operating in the literature. Apart from the undoubted merit craft and inventive, with added difficulties in terms of the assumption of voices and modes of regular contributors to the publication, I thought, rather than a bombastic exercise in debunking, etc.., Etc., A great joke which I laughed until my own credulity, and which must have laughed a lot more to the author, incidentally. So far so good, in any case, well, I would say. But another thing is because I think I am leaning that high corrective intended (and that we deserve so much) had set its corrosive effect much better if he had not discovered the deception the next day as they say, if the impostor had left its mark only in that list of contributors at the end of the magazine, in which everything is false too, of course. Everything but his name and his confession to the crime. That it should have been left there alone, I think, to be developed and that great act fake with all the corrosive power that has no doubt. I insist it all that necessary. I do not know, I have the feeling that the discovery of the fraud as soon be defused a powerful virus. Although some of the staff have gone missing and the search engine stop Dialnet academic. Even so, I dunno.

Meanwhile, my dear David Roas friend coordinated the month of September the number 765 of the magazine dedicated to Insula fantasy literature held in Spain over the last thirty years. Here there are all partners real cases, consistent as you or me. I know Juan Jacinto Muñoz Rengel, David, Ana Casas ... No cheating. No catch. But they all deal with something that, paradoxically, how fantastic, beyond our notion of reality, something that "can not be named or described in detail, as they say out there, something that strictly speaking, then, there . And they all strive to give touchingly a physical, tangible, true to what you can not own it in any way. I do not see the fantastic, I can not see, but I see them all clearly. So, I think, Chimera something fantastic, something that does not exist, show me a reality that could abscribirme without conflict, however Insula observable reality persuades me to a certain conflict invention.

Meanwhile, my dear friend Hugo Abbati had told me and the concern he felt in a remote aldeúcha of Benin this summer when a bunch of black kids as the blight was passed from hand to hand G7 digital camera art , previously he had taken without permission, he said, and began to shoot left and right. A reality now talking about maybe another reality that was expressed in the picture accompanying this post, ie that no longer exists.

meantime, I write this without really knowing if it is false or not, if I am myself an invention if that really me writing, or is another maybe my name and my surroundings, as claimed by the other Borges Borges and if my identity will be diluted in the text or will be strengthened, and physical, through the name I now say, mine, Francisco Javier Torres. Who I am. Or not. Finally, do not know where to wear.

G Nadine Jansen Forum

The Nobel Vargas What

Here's mine, one among the multitude of voices have been raised to celebrate the Nobel Prize for Vargas. Of course I also without doubt one of the myriad of voices that have hailed the successful, this time, Vargas concession award many times controversial. Without linguistic homeland. Without ideological reservations. Plain and simple because I think a novelist exceptional. Say
not long ago that I could consider myself only a casual reader of novels. Read novels, of course, and not a few have fallen by now, but I kept with me almost always, and even some still do, not believe the terrible trial of this kind had Cioran. For cioraniano then (and now, alas), I could not, could not consider it my favorite genre, which served me well perhaps to hide my laziness, need not deceive ourselves. I no longer think alike. Despite not forget that negative opinion influenced me so much, I acknowledge that I have been very happy reading novels, much more than we ever could have imagined at the time of my unblemished denial. One of those moments of almost inexpressible joy it gave me exactly Vargas. It happened when I read about four summers ago The Feast of the Goat. I read that novel absolutely sucked into their amazing fabulous energy and hypnotic. Also linguistic. Literature. From this reading I think I could consider myself completely refurbished for the novel because I support today with relish (and keeping intact my admiration for Cioran, huh?, Mind you). So I have to be grateful to Vargas. And that is why I am so glad that you have received the premiazos premiazo of which, as is often said (and no doubt on this occasion), adorns the giver more than the recipient.
Indeed, evil, grief Vargas / García is on tables. At what level will deliver the next assault?
Indeed, after reading this summer The Feast of the Goat , I loaded Libra Don De Lillo. Another performance. But that's what I already have another day ...